Thursday, December 27, 2007
Tuesday, December 18, 2007
Monday, December 17, 2007
Board breakers in marshal arts say that in order to break the wood prank effectively, the fist has to penetrate beyond the board. In simple understanding, the force is withheld and not fully released until it passes the board. It is then the arm is extended and straightened.
In order for maximum ball distance, it is said release in down swing should not happen prior to striking the ball. This is actually very confusing. It is also said keep the arms close to the body and hands should be ahead of club head. All these instructions actually narrow down to a simple principle, the hands should not be extended and straightened prior to ball impact.
If the hands are not extended, force is withheld, arms are close to body, hands will be ahead of ball and force will be transferred onto ball effectively. All it needs now is to find a synchronized timing where the head is square at impact during the downswing.
It is much easier to remember the principle then to memorize the methods and match it with the swing sequence.
Sunday, December 16, 2007
Saturday, December 15, 2007
Wednesday, November 28, 2007
Proving Yourself
Golf is a never satisfying game. You will never see a good golfer that says “I am satisfied with my game today”. There are many reasons behind this: many clubs to master, changing condition, physique variation, etc… however all good golfers will agree it is a never-satisfying but fun game.
Being fun is the key. It is fun to hit a long and straight shot, it is more fun when this long and straight shot landed where you want it to be, over the pond but before the bunker. It is unbelievable fun when you add a little draw into this shot and it flies long and curve along the fairway, over the pond and before the bunker, and split the fairway in half. Once you have tasted the fun from this, you want more and try to reproduce this whenever you want, so you work hard on it, controlling your shots. In the end, you immerge yourself into the zone, where nothing else matters.
There is, however, another approach many golfers take. They constantly try to prove themselves. Proving yourself is a great motivation, but never a key to the ultimacy. Proving yourself pushes you to achieve what you think you can, without knowing the reasons why you can’t. You work on the belief, instead of the technique; you build up the confidence, founded on top of pile of artificial intelligence. In the end, you have to get over proving yourself, then you still have to train yourself to control the shots, after that you need to learn how to consistently reproducing the same shots, all of these before you could discover the joy and fun in the process.... Following this pattern, it is a long way to go.... before the joy and fun could bring you to the next level of clarity and performance.
Let the fun lead you to the ultimacy. You will be a better skilled golfer; You can prove yourself all that you want then.
Wednesday, November 14, 2007
Science to maximum drive
…the author of The Physics of Golf, calculated that 32 pounds of muscle needs to be generated for a typical professional golfer’s swing to deliver two horsepower of energy…
…Using the example of a boxer striking an object, they find that striking through the object to a point further in allows them to achieve the highest momentum and energy to accomplish their action. One reason amateur golfers have vastly different collision dynamics is that they may not have developed the skill to strike through the ball…
…Most golfers are under the impression that the weight shift occurs from the left foot to the right foot during the backswing and returns from the right foot to the left foot in the downswing. This actually is a misnomer…
…Basketball players play with the ball bouncing and rotating in their fingers before shooting a free throw to sharpen the sensitivity in their fingertip nerve endings… Professional golfers roll their hands around the grip before settling on the final hold in order to activate their sensory…
Excellent read:
-- Copyright © 2004 - 2007 Taras V. Kochno, M.D.
http://www.drkochno.com/science_&_golf.htm
Tuesday, November 13, 2007
MOI Matched Follow-up
It seems quite repelling to many purist to accept the concept of progressive swing weighting or MOI matching. Ironically, the concept of MOI matching is to achieve the goal that all clubs require to swing with the same force, it is SW matching that requires progressive higher force to swing clubs.
from lower numbered Iron to higher numbered Iron:
- MOI Matching = progressive higher Swing Weight = same force
- SW Matching = progressive lower force = same Swing Weight
Brought the MOI matched iron set to the golf course last weekend. Sometime ago, I started to believe that the first hit on course will determine if the newly adjusted golf club is a good fit or just a legendary theory. After a good drive on the 1st tee, left me with approximately 185 yards to the green, I chose a 5 iron. Currently at D0.5, 419g and 37.75 inch long, it is one of the MOI matched club at around 423. I swung, and caught the ball clean, the response was good and I was delighted for a second, not to realize later that I was 1 club short in distance and also pushed to the right by 20 feet in direction. This was alarmingly disapproving according to my superstition. Considering the air temperature at 40F and wearing 3 layers of clothing, I suspected I was blocking myself, sending the ball right. It was not until later, that I found out I was pushing the balls all day long.
Monday, November 05, 2007
- Best substitute to acetone for polishing ferrule: Nail Polish Remover
- Best woods cleaner and polisher: Auto Paint Polish (Mcguire Scratch X)
- Best irons cleaner and polisher: Alloy/Chrome wheel polish
- Best solution to clean grips: few tablespoon of PineSol in a bucket of water, dry with tacky feel.
- Best method to install ferrule: lubricate ferrule's inner wall with epoxy, push it down the shaft and ram it with club head.
- Best way to reduce an oversize ferrule: use a large flat plier and clamp down the installed ferrule in rotating motion, creating a tight fit with the hosel, polish with nail polish remover
- Best home cutter for steel or graphite shaft: Dremer tool
- Best shaft puller: Golfsmith Shaft Extractor
- Best way to clean club's hosel: Steel Wire Brush with hand dril
- Best source for heat: Heat Gun, never use torch
Sunday, October 28, 2007
MOI Special Report
If swing weight measurement is to determine the weight of a golf club from its mass in respect to its balance point, then MOI measurement is to determine the centrifugal force in respect to its swing weight. Both of these when applying on a golf swing, it is simply reflected as a feeling of how much force does a club requires to be swung in respect to time within the swing motion.
How does this apply to golf swing?
In simple understanding, if I could match irons set according to MOI instead of SW, I could switch from iron to iron maintaining the same rhythm with the same swing force, where as in SW I have to adjust my rhythm accordingly.
MOI approach:
To accurate measure MOI in golf club, it requires expensive equipment like MOI machine
Yet, Dave Tutelman had done extensive research and provide the poor-man fitting method (reference 4) which I currently adopt. Below is where I begin the long struggle of clubs fitting process.
MOI Equation:
MOI = Lc2 * (H + S/3) + 10 * G | S is weight of the shaft | Lc is length of the club | ||
| | | H weight of the head | G is grip weight |
First attempt:
Used an ½ SW point per ½ inch method. Picked my favorite 7 iron, starting from C9.5 and progressively reduce ½ SW point to 3I and increase ½ SW point to PW.
Match 2: MP 32 + 1150GH + Golf Pride DD2 | ||||||||||||
IRONS | T W | WH + WS | WH + WS + TW | W S (+Grip) | WS | L S | W H | W H + T W | MOI | MOI / 1000'S | Jeff's MOI | SW |
3 | 6 | 400 | 406 | 162 | 112 | 38.75 | 238 | 244 | 422,940 | 423 | 141 | C7.5 |
4 | 6 | 407 | 413 | 163 | 113 | 38.25 | 244 | 250 | 421,374 | 421 | 140 | C8.0 |
5 | 5 | 413 | 418 | 163 | 113 | 37.75 | 250 | 255 | 417,568 | 418 | 139 | C8.5 |
6 | 6 | 420 | 426 | 162 | 112 | 37.25 | 258 | 264 | 418,619 | 419 | 139 | C9.0 |
7 | 4 | 428 | 432 | 163 | 113 | 36.75 | 265 | 269 | 414,673 | 415 | 138 | C9.5 |
8 | 6 | 435 | 441 | 161 | 111 | 36.25 | 274 | 280 | 417,058 | 417 | 139 | D0.0 |
9 | 6 | 444 | 450 | 163 | 113 | 35.75 | 281 | 287 | 415,444 | 415 | 138 | D0.5 |
P | 6 | 453 | 459 | 162 | 112 | 35.50 | 291 | 297 | 421,844 | 422 | 140 | D1.0 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Result: MOI is random
Second attempt:
Used more precise measurement: +/- ½ SW point and 1.35 SW point per inch (0.675 SW per ½ inch), progressively increasing SW from 3I to PW.
Match 4A: MP32 + 1150GH + Golf Pride DD2 | |||||||||||
IRONS | Actual TW | WH + WS | WH + WS + TW | W S (+Grip) | WS | L S | W H | W H + T W | MOI | MOI / 1000'S | Measured SW |
3 | 4 | 400 | 404 | 162 | 112 | 38.75 | 238 | 242 | 419,936 | 420 | 7.5 |
4 | 5 | 407 | 412 | 163 | 113 | 38.25 | 244 | 249 | 419,911 | 420 | 8.0 |
5 | 7 | 413 | 420 | 163 | 113 | 37.75 | 250 | 257 | 420,418 | 420 | 9.0 |
6 | 7 | 420 | 427 | 162 | 112 | 37.25 | 258 | 265 | 420,006 | 420 | 9.5 |
7 | 6 | 428 | 434 | 162 | 112 | 36.75 | 266 | 272 | 418,274 | 418 | 10.5 |
8 | 8 | 435 | 443 | 161 | 111 | 36.25 | 274 | 282 | 419,686 | 420 | 10.5 |
9 | 9 | 443 | 452 | 162 | 112 | 35.75 | 281 | 290 | 418,852 | 419 | 11.0 |
P | 8 | 453 | 461 | 162 | 112 | 35.50 | 291 | 299 | 424,364 | 424 | 11.5 |
Result: MOI is more uniformly distributed yet it is still unsatisfactory
Third attempt:
Manually adjust tip weight and computationally match MOI at 420 range
Match 4B: MP32 + 1150GH + Golf Pride DD2 | |||||||||||||
IRONS | Round TW | WH + WS | WH + WS + TW | W S (+Grip) | WS | L S | W H | W H + T W | MOI | MOI / 1000'S | Ref Target SW | Actual SW | Adjusted SW |
3 | 6 | 400 | 406 | 162 | 112 | 38.75 | 238 | 244 | 422,940 | 423 | 7.475 | 9.0 | 8.0 |
4 | 7 | 407 | 414 | 163 | 113 | 38.25 | 244 | 251 | 422,837 | 423 | 8.15 | 8.5 | 8.5 |
5 | 9 | 413 | 422 | 163 | 113 | 37.75 | 250 | 259 | 423,269 | 423 | 8.825 | 10.5 | 10.0 |
6 | 9 | 420 | 429 | 162 | 112 | 37.25 | 258 | 267 | 422,782 | 423 | 9.5 | 10.0 | 10.5 |
7 | 8 | 429 | 437 | 162 | 112 | 36.75 | 266 | 275 | 422,326 | 422 | 10.175 | 11.5 | 11.5 |
8 | 10 | 435 | 445 | 161 | 111 | 36.25 | 274 | 284 | 422,314 | 422 | 10.85 | 11.5 | 12.0 |
9 | 12 | 443 | 455 | 162 | 112 | 35.75 | 281 | 293 | 422,687 | 423 | 11.525 | 11.5 | 12.5 |
P | 10 | 453 | 463 | 162 | 112 | 35.50 | 291 | 301 | 426,885 | 427 | 12.2 | 2.5 | 12.5 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Result: MOI range is tighter while PW is specifically left with high MOI. I figure SW is more important for wedges due to partial and finesse swing for short game. Overall SW is bumped another 1 ~ 2 point from assembly.
Final assembled attempt:
Mizuno MP32 + | ||||||||||||||
IRONS | Round TW | WH + WS + Grip | WH + WS + TW | W S (+Grip) | WS | L S | W H | W H + T W | MOI | MOI / 1000s | Ref Target SW | Actual SW | Adjusted SW | Raw SW |
3 | 6 | 400 | 406 | 162 | 112 | 38.75 | 238 | 244 | 422,940 | 423 | 7.475 | 9.0 | 8.0 | 5.0 |
4 | 7 | 407 | 414 | 163 | 113 | 38.25 | 244 | 251 | 422,837 | 423 | 8.150 | 8.5 | 8.5 | 5.0 |
5 | 9 | 413 | 422 | 163 | 113 | 37.75 | 250 | 259 | 423,269 | 423 | 8.825 | 10.5 | 10.0 | 5.5 |
6 | 9 | 420 | 429 | 162 | 112 | 37.25 | 258 | 267 | 422,782 | 423 | 9.500 | 10.0 | 10.5 | 6.0 |
7 | 8 | 429 | 437 | 162 | 112 | 36.75 | 266 | 275 | 422,326 | 422 | 10.175 | 11.5 | 11.5 | 7.5 |
8 | 10 | 435 | 445 | 161 | 111 | 36.25 | 274 | 284 | 422,314 | 422 | 10.850 | 11.5 | 12.0 | 7.0 |
9 | 11 | 443 | 455 | 162 | 112 | 35.75 | 281 | 292 | 421,409 | 423 | 11.525 | 11.5 | 12.0 | 6.5 |
P | 10 | 453 | 463 | 162 | 112 | 35.50 | 291 | 301 | 426,885 | 427 | 12.200 | 12.5 | 12.5 | 7.5 |
number of balls tested: 180 balls location:
Overall the “new” irons sets are lighter than my previous set by average of 8 grams in static weight. How much is 8g in static weight differs? Not much since my swing weight is kept at the same range. However, it is a lot easier for me to switch from club to another club, especially noticeable with 3I. I have tried on randomly chosen iron from one club to the other and I could not feel any difference in swinging force. Using the same rhythm to swing each club, the feel is tremendously rewarding, even though PW is felt much heavier than 3I in static weight, they are comparable similar in motion. There is virtually not much change in trajectory, height and distance, but I feel it is much easier to produce desired shot with each club under MOI matching. This set of iron is suddenly more forgiving than ever.
Equipment used:
Mizuno MP32 3I ~ PW + Nippon shaft 1150GH Tour stiff + Golf Pride DD2
Digital scale (Accuracy +/- 1g)
Golfsmith shaft puller + swing weight scale (Precision 0.5 SW point) + golf clubs making essentials
total cost: $126 for 9 Nippon Shafts + $4.56 DD2 grip each
References:
1. Tom Wishon on MOI:
http://www.wishongolf.com/moi.php
2. Definition of Moment of Inertia:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moment_of_inertia
3. Why your golf club is obsolete:
http://www.calgolftech.com/whats_new/driver57.html
4. Dave T’s club design notes:
http://www.tutelman.com/golf/design/swingwt4.php?ref=#measure_moi