Tuesday, May 27, 2008
It is not like I could walk in to GolfSmith and pick up an OnOff driver and talk about it. It is such a rare incident that I could try an OnOff driver. The model tried was an old stock model, R flex, 10* degree and D0.5 balance.
The first impression, SMOOTH KICK : MP-606D shaft is felt stiffer than average regular flex. It felt tight, responsive and accelerating. It is a very good feeling that I hardly get from stock club. Shaft itself is impressive enough that if Daiwa allows its shafts to be sold separately, it will be a big hit. The quality of the head is beautifully constructed. Most importantly, the sound is crystal, in the audible range where it is not loud like FT-i and not sharp like Honma, but just nice.
Overall feedback on this club is really good. It is one of the rare circumstances where you like it much on the first trial.
Monday, May 19, 2008
According to the Analyst, Tiger's driving method is the third to the least efficient among tour pros, using high-launch / back-spin measuring ratio. In other words, the efficiency measured today is launching the ball optimally higher and reducing back spin significantly. Tiger's driving totally contradicts this concept while he could achieve 20 yds longer his 292 yds average distance, if he choose to launch the ball higher, argued the analyst.
Tiger's comment to Nike: build him a ball with highest back spin (Nike Platinum) so he could attack aggressively around the green (ever seen his ball back spinned from the bunker?) and it is his job to control the ball's launch angle.
Henrik Stenson, on the other hand, led the tour's most efficient launch/spin ratio with 311 yds drive. Anthony Kim, the new young tour pro, drive the ball 295 yds at the Chrysler championship, had ball distance-to-apex at 200 feet while the average range at 175 feet. Bubba Watson, again, another long hitter, ball speed at 182 mph and averaging over 300 yds drive launch the ball significantly higher.
Thus, besides focusing to create back spin off the bunker, it would be optimal to launch the ball higher, drive with least back spin and maybe possible to reach most par 5 in 2 from men’s tee.
Thursday, May 15, 2008
Optimal Scenario 1
A normal rod with distributed static weight will have a balance point in the center of the rod.
When a load A is applied at one end with distance X to center, a same Load B at the other end with distance X to center will be needed to balance this rod.
This situation is under the condition where:1. Load A = Load B
2. Static weight is uniformly distributed across the rod
Scenario 2
In the case of a golf club, where static weight is not normally distributed across the club, there is shaft weight, grip weight and head weight.
Balance point of the club is usually at a point where it is closer to the club head. Measurement of swing weight inherits this concept to measure the balance of the club and express it in unit fulcrum.
1. This golf club is not efficient; the full amount of Load B is not efficient transferred to Load A’
2. Feel of impact is less than ideal, where an ideal feel of impact at Load A’ will provide steady and balanced response.